Showing posts with label bankruptcy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bankruptcy. Show all posts
But I Want More Stuff!
Tuesday, February 21, 2012 at 10:19 AMIt never ceases to amaze me how many of my bankruptcy clients ask, "How soon can I get a credit card/car loan/mortgage." Geez, kids, cool your jets. First, one of your problems coming out of bankruptcy will be that you'll start receiving credit card offers right away because they know you're stuck with the bankruptcy waiting period and can't stiff them any time soon. Are you really so eager to feed the vultures? Second, incurring debt you couldn't service is what brought you to my office in the first place. You may think you're flush, but you're still just one job loss or medical emergency from being back in the tank. Try this thing called "saving" for awhile. Ask your grandparents; they can probably tell you all about it.
Look, we all want things. I want a new car and house, too, but here's a news flash: Tomorrow will come, and if you spent it all today, tomorrow is going to hurt. Badly. So I maintain my cars (Memo to me: Get that front end looked at.), and I keep renting. When we moved from Washington to Utah seven years ago, My Dear Wife wanted to buy another house. I said, "No dear, this market is whack." She was incensed that I would do something so un-American as fail to incur consumer debt. But guess what? I was right. And we'll keep renting, too, much to her chagrin, because in less than 10 years, we'll have an empty nest, so why do I want to go buy extra bedrooms and baths?
It's called "thinking," people. Do it or pay the price.
Some Recovery
Thursday, December 15, 2011 at 10:31 AMThings have slowed down in bankruptcy world, and now I have an idea why: People are too broke to care. The latest census report shows that nearly half the population is either "in poverty" or "low income". In other words, half the country either can't afford to file or has so little worth that filing is pointless. When exactly was it the recession ended?
Of course the Heritage Foundation (The only "heritage" that foundation has is shilling for the 1%. Just saying.) trots out its "poverty expert" Robert Rector (Oh, it's such a strain not to do naughty puns on his name.) to say that they're not really poor (by Mumbai standards), that we do enough for them already (Look at all the taxes rich people have to pay.), and that we just need to teach them how to be "self-sufficient." Of course, this toady has been shoveling this line for decades. Don't believe me? Google him. Or look at this article from 11 years ago where he's claiming the gap between rich and poor isn't so bad because of all the poverty programs the rich have to pay for (First, note how he conflates "income gap", which is bad enough, with "wealth gap", which is more accurate and is absolutely obscene. Second, note that the gap has only gotten worse, due in large part to policies the Heritage Foundation promotes. Don't believe me? I'll let those Commies over at Forbes lay it out for you. And while I'm over at Forbes, took a look at this article on 1% wheels. Don't you love that remark by the Bugatti CEO, "The crisis cannot keep a Bugatti buyer away from buying a car for financial reasons”?). Or this article, in which he claims the poor don't need more food because so many are already overweight (conflating "underfed" and "undernourished"). Or how about his remarks to the New York Times saying all but a very few people are merely "constrained" in the type of food they buy, so there is no hunger problem. Just to show you you what level of dinkage this guy operates on, he's also the Heritage Foundation's "expert" on abstinence-only sex "education". News flash: That's the kind of sex education we had when I was a kid and on before that, and ignorance really wasn't a terribly effective contraceptive. The difference is that, back then, a 17-year-old could get a job that could support the girl and baby. Those jobs are gone, and the Heritage Foundation led the charge to destroy them.
OK, rant over. The bottom line is that things are not improving. If unemployment figures are going down, it's because people have dropped out of the work force or are holding jobs that barely qualify as jobs. People are hungry and cold and desperate, regardless what the paid shills say. And it's getting worse, not better.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)